 |
Mani Shankar Aiyar is
the angry, young man these days. And the receipient of Aiyar's ire is
the Directorate General Hydrocarbons (DGH). A clarion call by
petroleum minister Mani Shankar Aiyar has targetted the DGH as being
in urgent need for reform. At a recent interaction with members of the
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), the minister stressed the
pressing requirement for a dramatic transformation of the DGH. In
short, a transformation which translates into transparency: A revamp
which would enable the DGH to effectively interpret the rules of the
game -- the terms and conditions of E&P activity -- and "regulate the
sector in the fairest manner possible". What exactly prompted Aiyar to
single out the DGH? There has been significant speculation on this
within petroleum circles: While one opinion maintains that he was
offended by what he saw when |
|
he visited the DGH
office on Kasturba Gandhi Marg -- a lackadaisical staff
and rows of empty rooms -- the other opinion, perhaps not entirely
justified, suggests that the minister was actually swayed by a
proposal from the persuasive Norwegian Ambassador Jon Westborg to help
reform the DGH along the lines of Norway's Oljedirektoratet
(Norwegian Petroleum Directorate). Whatever may have been the real
reason for Aiyar's ire, there is no denying the dire need for an
overhaul of the DGH -- in its lethargic decision-making process and
its sluggish machinery. Ironically, empowering the DGH would mean
giving it more power than what the minister himself enjoys. For, the
DGH's ineffectiveness, in most part, stems from the petroleum
ministry's near-complete control over the organisation. The DGH
director general spends more time rationalising his decisions to
mandarins in Shastri Bhavan than
in his own office. An independent DGH does not mean that the petroleum
ministry would have nothing to do with it. Instead, it would work in
partnership with the government -- enjoying a degree of autonomy --
but not entirely in subordination to it. Of course, every file of
significance in the DGH need not course its torturous way to Shastri
Bhavan, and on to the minister's desk and back again. As a matter of
fact, it may not be such a bad idea to style the DGH along the lines
of the present-day Oljedirektoratet. After all, it was
the original Norwegian model which was followed when the DGH was first
set up. There is, in fact, a lot that India can learn on the oil
sector from Norway, the tiny speck on the map of the world. It is
Norway, with proven reserves of 10.2 billion barrels of oil, which is
the third-largest exporter of oil and gas in the world. The
Oljedirektoratet has often been adjudged as one of
the best petroleum regulatory bodies in the world.
Interestingly, the Oljedirektoratet's is not an entirely
independent entity -- its powers are defined by policy
parameters set by Norway's Ministry of Petroleum & Energy and the two
have a synergetic relationship, working in sync with each other on
most issues. The Norwegian regulator's ambit, however, is not limited
merely to overseeing petroleum activities, but also encompasses the
collection of petroleum taxes on behalf of the finance ministry.
The Oljedirektoratet's
responsibility extends to evolving
cost-effective exploration and production practices, coordination
across production licenses and in the building and dissemination of
data on the petroleum industry. In January 2004,
the safety and environment
responsibilities of the
Oljedirektoratet metamophosed into a
Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA), which now functions under the
labour ministry. As far as India is concerned, it is not the extensive
caveats contained in the PSC which are a cause for concern for private
operators -- the provisions have been modeled along the lines of
similar contracts in other countries -- it is the interpretation and
implementation of these caveats which causes problems.
Given effective powers, some functional
autonomy and a breather from Shastri Bhavan babus, there is no
reason why the DGH cannot become a desi imitation of the
Oljedirektoratet. In the meantime, Aiyar could hum: I once
had a DGH, or should I say it once had me.... oh, isn't it good,
Norwegian Wood.... By Santanu Saikia
|